« If It Looks Like Spam, Smells Like Spam... | Main | How To Blow $1 Million In Under 1 Minute »
August 7, 2009
The "Real-time, Online Communications Revolution"
I am a facile and reasonably consistent blogger and social media user. Which is why I found the panic resulting from Thursday's Twitter outage to be somewhat amusing. At least a little part of me thought "These people need to get a life."
In fact, that may be the point.
In an article on CNN titled "Twitter blockout left users feeling 'jittery', 'naked'." Marc Cooper, a professor of journalism at USC noted that the hysteria that resulted from the blackout may be the ultimate sign that "instant, online communication is here to stay."
"Fighting the trend would be like trying to stop the ocean's tides, he said, but it's unclear where the technology will take our society.
'The bottom line is that we don't know. All of this is too new,' he said. 'It's like sitting around in the year 1500 and trying to figure out where the printing press was going to take us.' "
What a great analogy. So, how did 40 million people increasingly addicted to a technology that is barely stable, let alone being solid enough to hinge our lives on?
In business, one reason is that thought leaders like Chris Brogan or David Armano, who once ruled the blog world of marketing and now rule the Twitter world, tell us its important. But these arbiters of "the next big thing" are people whose day job IS using tools like Twitter, and who wants to be told what to do? But, it is also because companies like Starbucks and Comcast have validated their advice and provided overwhelming evidence of its value in areas like customer service and consumer engagement.
In consumer life, the "arbiters" are the socially-active, who found yet another way to broadcast their lives. But beyond the mindless posting of questionably interesting personal data, it is also real people like the "Twitter Moms" who found out how easy it could be to rally support for a consumer cause (justly or unjustly)...in just seconds.
It is in part, because Twitter has "democratized" real-time information and made "newscasters" of everyone. Whether it was the plane crash on the Hudson or the protests in Iran, we've learned that no one is better at presenting the news...than us. Real-time news undoubtedly impacted the course of events in Iran, and will no doubt change how governments respond to similar protests in the future.
And of course, there is the pragmatic lure of access to millions of minds. Sure, most of us have no time to either type about or read about lunch habits of the rich and marginally famous. But when we are stuck on a vexing problem, or perhaps just looking for advice on a place to eat in a strange city, who wouldn't want to tap the collective wisdom of the herd? When I needed to get a programming question answered recently, one place I posted to was Twitter.
And so, beyond the amusement, I also found Thursday instructive. First, because the impact Twitter demonstrated should be a real wakeup call to companies ignoring the "real-time, online communications revolution." Instead of always talking about Twitter, maybe if we refer to the trend that way, companies will be less likely to ignore it. And second, because so many of the panicked were not people wondering what Ashton Kutcher was going to have for lunch. Instead, lots of people with real jobs (journalists, customer service personnel, etc.), were displaced because their lifeline to "real-time, online information" had been cut.
Life doesn't happen in 140-character blocks. But obviously, lots of news, facts and fun CAN be communicated in those tiny tweets.
Posted by jcioban at August 7, 2009 6:10 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.freshsqueezedmarketing.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/165
